Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX edges out Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) and the weight (200g / 7,05oz). Still, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 ARB and a maximum drag of 19kg / 41.89 lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L
