Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a ball bearings of 4 ARB, while Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4 ARB), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin REDIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
