Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
78.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Both Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
