Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €383.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.86 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
