Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Delphin INKS 5000X
