Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 39.0 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX
