Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Stradic FM
Spinning
1000fmx
77.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €144.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX edges out Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6+1). Still, Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05 lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT and Shimano Stradic FM?
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
