Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
89.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (210g / 7,41oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Certate and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
