Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Airity LT
Spinning
91.80 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €250.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Airity LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
