Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X
