Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 215g / 7,58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Delphin INKS 2000X
