Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
79.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €98.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.03 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin RAYA body
