Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
Spinning
58.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.97 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61oz
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank79cm / 31.10 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €48.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000 HGS
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.14mm-145m / 0.16mm-105m/0.18mm-80m
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD and Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7.58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
