Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX edges out Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the ball bearings (8). Still, Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R
