Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €212.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX clearly outshines Penn Battle III 8000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) and weight (215g / 7,58oz). While Penn Battle III 8000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
