Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
85.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.5:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag18kg / 39.68lbs
Weight3265g / 115.17oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €779.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80WA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX and Shimano Tiagra 80WAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Tiagra 80WAX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Tiagra?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
