Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
82.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight2365g / 83.42oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX and Shimano Tiagra 50AX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX offers a weight of 205g / 7,23oz, while Shimano Tiagra 50AX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Tiagra?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 50AX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX
