Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Daiwa Crossfire LT?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
