Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS
Multireels
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag19kg / 41.89 lbs
Weight1625g / 57.32oz
Line retireve per crank111/41 cm - 43.70/16.14 inch
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €337.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofillbs/yds: 50/700. 80/440
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX offers a weight of 195g / 6,88oz, while Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) and Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX
