Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- The 5.67 out of 10 (4.9:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
