Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 8 out of 10 (85 centimeter) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX
