Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX offers a weight of 215g / 7,58oz, while Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD stands out for a ball bearings of 8. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
