Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 22 Exist LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX
