Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
71.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36614 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €66.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a durability of 5.89 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
