Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 235g / 8,29oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (8), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Beastmaster
