Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (380kg / 837,76lbs) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (380kg / 837,76lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
