Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Daiwa BG
Spinning
55.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.83 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank109 centimeter / 42.91 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €117.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/320

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Daiwa BG 4500X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter). While Daiwa BG 4500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa BG and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa BG 4500X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Delphin HORNET 30X
