Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750, QC 750, Spinning Angelrolle, Frontbremse, 10431-175
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €22.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeQC 750
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Shimano Sienna, 1000, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, front drag, SN1000FG
Shimano Sienna
Spinning
49.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.25 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight225g / 7.94oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €27.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size1000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Conclusion

Both Shimano Sienna 1000X and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and line retrieve per crank. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sienna 1000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.

What's the difference between Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 and Shimano Sienna?

Shimano Sienna 1000X

  • The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues