Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa RX LT
Spinning
49.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.06/200

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa RX LT 2000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Daiwa RX LT 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa RX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa RX LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
