Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G)
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €421.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa TANACOM 1200X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.2:1) and the weight (235g / 8,29oz). Still, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a durability of 5.72 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G)?
Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
