Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84 lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91cm / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000 HG
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/210. 0.30/130, 0.35/100 lb/yds: 6/230, 8/170, 10/140
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 1200X and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X offers a durability of 5.72 out of 10, while Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI?
Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8.82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91cm / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
