Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227
Conclusion
Daiwa TANACOM 800X clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and durability (5.71 out of 10). While Delphin CarbonIX 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANACOM 800X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa TANACOM 800X
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
