Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Delphin INKS 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €138.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29

Delphin INKS
Spinning
56.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/470
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX and Delphin INKS 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 70 centimeter / 27.56 inch, while Delphin INKS 4000X stands out for a ball bearings of 3+1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Levelwind and Delphin INKS?
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX
- At a maximum drag of 14,9kg / 32,85lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
