Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800

Shimano Sedona FJ
Spinning
74.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Daiwa TANACOM 800X and Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa TANACOM 800X offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANACOM and Shimano Sedona FJ?
Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.6 out of 10 (91 centimeter / 35.83 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X
