Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa TANASENSOR
Multireels
69.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.63 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/380

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Daiwa TANASENSOR clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.63 out of 10) and total score (6.97 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa TANASENSOR is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa TANASENSOR and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa TANASENSOR
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- A score of 6.29 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) gives a decent speed but doess not rush a lot
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX
