Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Delphin INKS 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/420
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Delphin INKS 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Delphin INKS 3000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 260g / 9,17oz and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa Tanacom 500 and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- A drag score of 6.03 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs) means you’re covered for most average carp battles without overthinking it
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Delphin INKS 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X
