Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin INKS
Spinning
44.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.6 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight400g / 14.11oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/490

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Delphin INKS 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and weight (535g / 18,87oz). While Delphin INKS 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin INKS and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin INKS 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX
