Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150
Conclusion
Both Delphin SHARX 3000X and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Delphin SHARX 3000X offers a weight of 239g / 8,43oz, while Daiwa TD FEEDER QD stands out for a maximum drag of 8kg. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- With a score like 8.41 out of 10 (239g / 8,43oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- With a maximum drag of 9.6 out of 10 (8kg), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
