Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
86.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1 / 1.3:1
Maximum drag17kg / 37.48lbs
Weight2447g / 86.32oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €633.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size50WA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 50WAX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (17kg / 37,48lbs) and line retrieve per crank (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch). While Delphin SHARX 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tiagra 50WAX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Shimano Tiagra?
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.41 out of 10 (239g / 8,43oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 50WAX
- With a serious drag score of 10 out of 10 (17kg / 37,48lbs), this reel is made to stop big carp in their tracks, even in rough terrain or tight swims
- Scoring 8.93 out of 10 (94 centimeter / 37.01 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
- With premium bearings scoring 5 out of 10 (4), this reel delivers buttery smooth operation even with load
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
