Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Delphin SHARX 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- With a score like 8.18 out of 10 (273g / 9,63oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
