Delphin SHARX 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
44.10 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight454g / 16.01oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/352

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX clearly outshines Delphin SHARX 6000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and ball bearings (7). While Delphin SHARX 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Delphin SHARX and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Delphin SHARX 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
- Solid value at €169.70, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of multireels fishing needs
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
