Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX
