Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (5+1) and the gear ratio (4.7). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano AERO XR?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX
