Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.0:1) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III Long Cast and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.6 out of 10 (6.0:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
