Penn Battle III 6000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Battle III
Spinning
67.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.81 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight590g / 20.81oz
Line retireve per crank104 centimeter / 40.94 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €113.30
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/310

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 6000X edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.6:1) and the durability (7.81 out of 10). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 535g / 18,87oz and a ergonomics of 5.91 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn Battle III and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Penn Battle III 6000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.8 out of 10 (5.6:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (11,3kg / 24,91lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
