Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) and ball bearings (4+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn FIERCE IV 2500X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn FIERCE IV and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5,5kg / 12,13lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.13 out of 10 (280g / 9,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
