Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch) and durability (5.98 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn International VISW and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX
