Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and maximum drag (5kg / 11,02lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
