Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and gear ratio (4.7). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Shimano AERO XR?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD
