Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX offers a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, while Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn Squall II Conventional and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
